psychoanalyst Hanna Segal puts forward two attitudes: "to have" vs. "to suffer". To have means "to see it as foreign and can be excluded", which is related to the "paranoid-schizoid position" proposed by another psychoanalyst Melanie Klein , which is a relatively primitive response mode ;to suffer means "to see it as related to oneself, must be considered and contained, and cannot be completely excluded",
Which is related to the "depressive position" popular database proposed by Klein, and a more complete understanding of things is a more mature response. Accordingly, this referendum proposal is expressing a "to have" attitude, as if humans can completely avoid using additives and have no impact on the natural environment; while the government's decision-making reflects "to suffer", trying to reduce the possibility of completely avoiding it.
Harm and seek maximum public benefit from it. Scholar Bion (WR Bion) mentioned capacity to suffer, claiming that "can endure setbacks and imperfections in order to think and form knowledge", and believes that "inability to bear setbacks and imperfections" failure to suffer means "incapable of thinking, Inability to know. Accordingly, the over-simplified/idealized public complaints are showing failure to suffer (additives and environmental impacts) and inability to know (about trade and clean power generation).